In the latest edition of City Journal, William Voegeli's article about the public sector strangling of the California economy provided the following nugget of wisdom:
Bill Watkins, executive director of the Economic Forecast Project at the University of California at Santa Barbara, has calculated that once you adjust for population growth and inflation, the state government spent 26 percent more in 2007–08 than in 1997–98. Back then, “California had teachers. Prisoners were in jail. Health care was provided for those with the least resources.” Today, Watkins asks, “Are the roads 26 percent better? Are schools 26 percent better? What is 26 percent better?”
Sadly, California is not the only state suffering from this phenomenon. As Arizona's Joint Legislative Budget Committee documents public school spending increased from $6,497 per student in the 2000 to $9,698 in 2009. Even after taking inflation into account, this amounted to more than a 20 percent increase in per student funding.
Since the late 1990s, the average 4th and 8th grade math, reading and science NAEP scores have improved by less than 1 percent. In short, Arizona taxpayers have paid substantially more for the same bad results.
Voegeli described this phenomenon as “The Big-Spending, High-Taxing, Lousy-Services Paradigm” and both Arizona students and taxpayers deserve better. Reversing Arizona's K-12 misery index of rising costs and stagnating scores can be done but will require a far reaching update to our broken and antiquated model of schooling.
Dr. Matthew Ladner is vice president for research at the Goldwater Institute.
Goldwater Institute: Fortune Favors the Bold: Reforms for Results in K-12 Education
Joint Legislative Budget Committee: K-12 Funding FY 2000 through FY 2009
City Journal: The Big-Spending, High-Taxing, Lousy-Services Paradigm