It’s time to let everyone—parents in Arizona and other states, along with state and national policymakers—see the results of Arizona’s education savings accounts. Over 400 children are using the accounts this year, and thousands more become eligible next year.
But a critical feature is missing from the accounts, and it is the same feature missing from Arizona’s private school tuition scholarship tax credit: We need a way to be sure children in these programs are learning.
It is exciting to see so many children attend the school that challenges them and prepares them for life through a tax credit scholarship or savings account. But children are shortchanged if our expectations stop at the schoolhouse doors. Unless they take regular assessments to measure their progress, how does a child or her parents or teachers know whether she is being prepared for the future?
The savings accounts and scholarships are also vulnerable to attack if we can never show that children using the programs are succeeding. Test results can also help schools see what is and is not working for the children using savings accounts or tax credit scholarships.
In his book Tests, Testing, and Genuine School Reform, Herbert J. Walberg explains that testing regimens are related to better student outcomes. A study of students required to take either the Advanced Placement, New York State Regents, or Canadian exams found that these students “perform nearly a full year ahead” their peers. Another study of 39 nations taking the same international test found that “students in rich and poor nations learned the most when their countries employed external, curriculum-based examinations.”
Details on testing are important; we will have to sweat the small stuff. The link below to our research explains how and why parents should be able to choose a test for their child and not be forced to take the state test. The state doesn’t need to be overly prescriptive, but students should be tested. We owe it to the thousands of children who could be receiving a better education to make sure those who have the freedom to choose their school now are actually getting one.
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Scores show voucher schools need accountability
Washington Post: Quality controls lacking for D.C. schools accepting federal vouchers
Yesterday morning Goldwater Institute attorney Nick Dranias argued before the Ninth Circuit on behalf of Tombstone, Arizona, defending Tombstone's right to access its water supply against hostile action by the Obama Administration.
As you may remember, last year a devastating combination of wildfires and monsoons ravaged Tombstone’s water supply, leaving only 3 of 25 springs in operation. Despite a declared state of emergency, the Obama administration still refuses to let the town repair its water lines, which originate in federal wilderness area, with anything besides horses and hand-tools, for fear of disturbing the Mexican spotted owl.
I discussed the case yesterday morning on Fox & Friends, which you can watch here.
The federal government often gets in the way during disaster and emergency situations when state and local governments need to protect the health and safety of the public. During the BP oil spill, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal wanted to send state workers out to protect the shorelines and the federal government held him off for weeks. Who knows how much damage to wildlife and the wetlands could have been prevented if Louisiana had been able to act quickly.
It's a terrible irony that constitutional law has deteriorated to the point where governments can ban Big Gulps under the guise of "public safety," but lack the right to restore a desperately needed water supply.
The Tenth Amendment guarantees state and municipal governments the right to protect public health and safety without seeking a permission slip from the federal government. We hope a victory in this case will help restore this critical freedom.
Goldwater Institute: Tombstone v. United States of America
New York Times: With Wild West Spirit, Tombstone Fights for Its Water
I’m a relative new-comer to Arizona, having lived here only five years. But I’ve traveled the length and breadth of the state, visiting more places than most native Arizonans have ever visited, if my personal sampling is any indication. Considering that, the degree to which Arizonans believe tourism is an economic powerhouse and worthy of government support is striking.
Take a look at the table below, which compares shares of GDP in the U.S., Arizona, and Texas. The two sectors most directly impacted by tourism are “Arts, entertainment, and recreation” and “Accommodation and food services.” Together, they contribute about one-half of 1 percent more to the Arizona economy than to the U.S. economy and over 1 percent more than to the Texas economy.
The tourism industry is not that much more of an economic contributor in Arizona than it is in the U.S. as a whole. And it’s a relatively small part of Arizona’s overall economy; certainly not an industry to plan economic recovery by.
So, what’s the point? The point is that state and local governments do a lot for tourism in this state, with all the government financed golf courses, stadiums, hotels and convention centers. Yet, it seems someone is constantly promoting yet another tourism scheme taxpayers need to fund. And even though we’ve spent a lot of money on the industry, it isn’t paying off with loads of new jobs.
But this is Arizona’s unfortunate pattern. Pick an industry, shower it with taxpayer money and hope jobs come. Instead of pinning our hopes on a hand-picked industry, Arizona needs to have the most efficient governments and produce the most efficient infrastructure, with the least intrusive taxes in the country. Do that and we might just see an economic revival that doesn’t depend on tourists.
Goldwater Institute: Lessons from Texas on Building an Economically Healthier Arizona
Goldwater Institute: How Arizona Can Become the Oakland A’s of the States
Goldwater Institute: When Government Picks Winners, It Creates Losers
Any decent political drama needs a few unexpected twists and turns and takes forever to come to an end, and the saga of the failed Prop 204 campaign to permanently raise the state’s sales tax is no different.
As reported by the Goldwater Institute in September, major support for the initiative came from the Arizona Students Association, which contributed $120,000 to the campaign and used an army of student interns to collect upwards of 20,000 signatures to qualify the measure for the ballot.
The contributions were not harmless, as the ASA is funded through a mandatory $2 per semester fee attached to the tuition bills of Arizona’s 130,000 public university students. Simply put, the First Amendment provides that people cannot be forced to pay for politics they don’t subscribe to.
Problems with the ASA are not limited to its political contributions. The organization’s non-student fulltime staff members on several occasions threatened dissenting student board members with lawsuits. Protest resignations of several board members from Arizona State University followed and finally the Arizona Board of Regents took notice.
This week, the Regents opted to suspend the collection of the ASA student fee, but to postpone a permanent decision on the issue until February. That decision added to the drama because the Regents’ posted meeting agenda called only for a discussion – and not taking action – on whether to eliminate the mandatory fee.
State open meeting laws require government agencies to give advanced and accurate information that reflects the purpose and possible outcomes of government meetings. The purpose is to give the public a heads-up on what is happening and to prevent decisions from being made in secret.
The Regents have said the vote was legal, but that they would re-vote on the matter at the Regents’ December meeting anyway.
In this case, the Regents’ decision to cast a new, properly-announced, vote is welcome. Tuition payments are due in January, and without a proper vote, Arizona students could be forced to contribute roughly $300,000 to the association.
Arizona Republic: Goldwater Institute targets student group
State of Arizona: Open Meeting Law 101
Recent Facebook Activity
Fifteen Bureaucrats Are Better Than One
Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) have announced that they will not recommend candidates to serve on the Independent Payment Advisory Board, the federal health care law’s panel of 15 bureaucrats tasked with reducing Medicare costs. In a letter to the president explaining their decision, Boehner and McConnell said they “believe Congress should repeal IPAB” and “hope establishing this board never becomes a reality.”Read More >>
Policymakers Need to be Adults when it Comes to Corporate Handouts
Economic development consultants act like children when they talk about attracting new businesses. Maybe a “deal closing” fund can help the state attract high-profile corporate relocations, they argue. Or maybe a special job training grant. Just do it this one time and it will make our state an economic powerhouse. Pretty please!Read More >>
Charter Schools Should have Better Access to Empty Public School Buildings
The wave of school building closures comes at a time when charter schools are disproportionally represented in the list of the top performing schools in the state. As TUSD shutters schools, shouldn’t the district find a way for successful charter schools to move in and give families better options?Read More >>