Home Builders v. Mesa (cultural impact fee case)

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version

Case background:

Under Arizona law and the federal Constitution, building fees are supposed to be limited to the costs for “necessary” services—such as roads and sewers—that new residential developments impose upon a community. But many Arizona cities have begun looking at impact fees as new revenue sources, using them to fund unrelated facilities. Across the Valley, impact fees are soaring even as homeowners struggle to pay their mortgages and one of Arizona’s most important industries is on the ropes.

As an initial foray against excessive impact fees, the liberty watchdog Goldwater Institute has challenged the legality of Mesa’s “cultural impact fee” which imposes a tax on new construction to pay for public facilities unrelated to the impact of new development, such as museums. The construction of new homes can negatively impact existing sewage systems or roads, but negatively impact existing museums?

Mesa’s cultural impact fee, which has increased from $59 per home in 1998 to $221 today, is an egregious abuse of impact fees. Cultural facilities are nice, but they certainly aren’t “necessary” public services. Furthermore, the particular facilities for which these fees are collected have already been built, and the city has no plans to construct new facilities as a consequence of new residential development. The cultural impact fee has simply become a tool for city governments to levy excessive taxes on Arizonans without representation.

A judge ruled in favor of Mesa in the cultural impact fee case, but the Goldwater Institute has filed an appeal.

View Press Releases Below:

Read More About Impact Fees:

The Stakes:

  • Stopping excessive taxes on residents who cannot vote for or against them
  • Restoring constitutionally limited impact taxes

Case Timeline:

  • September 5, 2007: Case filed with the Maricopa Superior County Court.
  • November 9, 2007:  Hearing scheduled with Judge Rayes, 1:30 PM at 101 W. Jefferson, East Court Building in courtroom 411.
  • December 10, 2007: Judge Rayes denies Mesa's motion to dismiss.
  • June 12, 2009: 10:00 a.m.  Oral argument before Hon. Douglas L. Rayes at 101 W. Jefferson, Courtroom 411.
  • July 14, 2009: Judge Rayes rules in favor of the City of Mesa.
  • July 16, 2009: The Goldwater Institute appeals Judge Rayes' decision.

  • June 23, 2010: 2 p.m. Oral arguments at Court of Appeals, Courtroom #1, 1501 W. Washington Street.

Case documents:

Media Coverage:

How can I help?

  • The stakes are high, help build positive press. Write letters to the editor for your local newspaper and let them know how you feel.
  • The Goldwater Institute's Scharf-Norton Constitutional Litigation Center is able to defend your constitutional freedom because of the generous donations of private individuals.  R. Evan Scharf and John R. Norton III have arranged for a $1 million challenge grant to establish and fund the Goldwater Institute Scharf-Norton Center for Constitutional Litigation. To donate to the litigation center or become a member of the Goldwater Institute, please call (602) 462-5000.

Learn more about the Goldwater Institute’s Scharf-Norton Center for Constitutional Litigation.

Goldwater Liberty Texts

Stay connected with the Goldwater Institute. Get free Goldwater updates and information sent directly to your cell phone.

Sign-Up Now!

________________________

Report Card

Is your legislator on the honor roll or did they earn a C, D or worse?

Look-up by Zip Code

Read the 2009 Legislative Report Card here

Spending Watch

How fast does the Arizona state government spend your money? $929 per second.

Click Here for Facts About the State Budget