A government that operates behind closed doors cannot be the government of a free people. The Goldwater Institute has prompted several reforms shining light into the inner workings of government, including the nation’s most comprehensive online database of line-by-line government spending and restrictions on politicians using tax money for self-promotion. Our regular watchdog reports are helping citizens hold their elected officials accountable.
- Press Releases
- In the News
- Amicus Briefs
- OpEds & Blogs
Arizona's Legislature: Less Than Half a LoafPosted on October 01, 2003 | Type: Press Release | Author: Satya Thallam
An old proverb holds that half a loaf is better than none. But what do you do with less than half a loaf?
Our Opinion: Goldwater's Ideals Don't Fly in TucsonPosted on September 29, 2003 | Type: In the News
Are they a bunch of losers or what? Voters are sure to wonder after taking a look at the Goldwater Institute's 2003 Legislative Report Card. (See on opposite page.)
Tucson Legislators Take Their Lumps in Goldwater Group's Vote RatingPosted on September 29, 2003 | Type: In the News
Tucson's legislators scored poorly on the Goldwater Institute's 2003 Legislative Report Card, which grades legislators according to their commitment to free markets, limited government, rule of law, individual liberty, and individual responsibility.
Goldwater Group Gives Low Grades to LegislatorsPosted on September 29, 2003 | Type: In the News
Republican legislative leaders earned only marginal marks, and no Democrat received higher than a D-grade, from the Goldwater Institute in its analysis of 191 votes during the 2003 Arizona legislative session.
Report Card: Arizona Legislators Score Poorly in 2003 Spring SessionPosted on September 29, 2003 | Type: Press Release
Phoenix-Arizona legislators scored poorly on the Goldwater Institute's 2003 Legislative Report Card, with averages for both the Senate and House of Representatives under 50 percent in an analysis of 191 votes in the areas of education, constitutional government, regulation, and fiscal policy. Votes were graded according to whether they promoted the principles of limited government, individual liberty, and individual responsibility.