Americans are a hard-working bunch and should keep what they earn. Our ideas for tax reform reduce the burden of taxes while ensuring governments have the resources to focus on core responsibilities.
Who can forget Augustus Gloop, the robust tike whose voracious appetite led to his demise in the chocolate river. So goes one moral from this timeless story: Gluttony is bad.
Likewise with the Arizona budget. Government programs are devouring every dime in sight. Arizona state government is consuming half-again as many resources as it was ten years ago, growing almost three times faster than per capita personal income. Now, the Governor and legislature propose increasing spending by another 23 and 19 percent respectively over last year.
Arizona Free Enterprise Club responds to Mayor Gordon
Dear Mayor Gordon:
Your comments in the Arizona Republic (May 2) about the effect of the proposed income tax cut on Phoenix's distribution of Urban Revenue Sharing (URS) are misleading.
Columbia University President Lee Bollinger kicked up a controversy by arguing for revamping the school’s graduate journalism program curriculum. Bollinger argued that the news media is a vital democratic institution and that journalists require a more rigorous academic education in order to do their job responsibly. Occasionally I read articles which make me think that folks like Bollinger are on to something.
The West is known as a low-tax, business friendly part of the country, and Arizona is no exception. But the truth is four neighboring states have lower corporate income taxes than Arizona: Colorado, Utah, Texas and Nevada.
Arizona’s nearly seven percent corporate income tax rate ranks 29th lowest in the country; which is nice, but no cause for celebration when considering our neighbors. Colorado, Utah and Texas have corporate income tax rates at five percent or lower and Nevada doesn’t have one at all.
Arizonans who pay federal income tax spend 73 days on average working for Washington. Then, they spend another 20 to 40 hours filling out tax forms. Ahh, for the good old days.
Abraham Lincoln imposed the country’s first income tax in 1862 to finance the civil war. After the tax expired numerous attempts were made to reinstate it, all of which were rebuffed. In 1895 the U.S. Supreme Court found the income tax unconstitutional. This Court decision led to the Constitution’s Sixteenth Amendment, the legalization of government directly taking income, in 1913.
Here at the Goldwater Institute a few staff members work to persuade people to voluntarily contribute to the organization. Since the Institute accepts no government funds, it relies wholly on private individuals and foundations to provide the resources to carry out its work promoting principled policy solutions to challenges facing Arizona. That's how it should be.
Giving privately to organizations and causes we believe in is a long-standing American tradition. Such is not the case with the recently passed Phoenix bond package.
Despite writers at the Arizona Republic opining that “The Symington tax cuts kept government from growing at the same pace as the state’s population,” the truth of the matter is overall state spending has increased more than 100 percent’"that’s five times population growth’"since those tax cuts. Government is now the second largest component of Arizona’s gross product. This is hardly “lean” government.
Governor Napolitano’s “targeted tax relief” plan is targeted indeed’"it rewards a few groups, on a few days, and only for certain behaviors.
Who will get touched by the targeted tax-cut wand this year?
Hybrid-fuel car owners stand to benefit; the better the mileage, the bigger the tax cut. But, with a sticker price well over $20,000 for most hybrids, this certainly won’t provide relief for lower income Arizonans. Nor will it help a family who needs a new minivan or a construction worker who buys a new truck.
California pulled in $71.5 billion tourist dollars, while Arizona managed "only" $10.5 billion, six times less, and ranked 17 in the nation, according to the Travel Industry Association of America's annual report. The Scottsdale Convention & Visitors Bureau has already used the report as an occasion to call for more taxpayer money to promote the state.
Arizonans paid $2.5 billion in income taxes in 2005, up 34 percent from the last year. What should the state legislature do with the unexpected $700 million? Senate Minority Leader Linda Aguirre, among others, is eager to "invest in Arizona" in other words, let government spend it.
Here's another option: Return it.