Americans are a hard-working bunch and should keep what they earn. Our ideas for tax reform reduce the burden of taxes while ensuring governments have the resources to focus on core responsibilities.
Here at the Goldwater Institute a few staff members work to persuade people to voluntarily contribute to the organization. Since the Institute accepts no government funds, it relies wholly on private individuals and foundations to provide the resources to carry out its work promoting principled policy solutions to challenges facing Arizona. That's how it should be.
Giving privately to organizations and causes we believe in is a long-standing American tradition. Such is not the case with the recently passed Phoenix bond package.
Despite writers at the Arizona Republic opining that “The Symington tax cuts kept government from growing at the same pace as the state’s population,” the truth of the matter is overall state spending has increased more than 100 percent’"that’s five times population growth’"since those tax cuts. Government is now the second largest component of Arizona’s gross product. This is hardly “lean” government.
Governor Napolitano’s “targeted tax relief” plan is targeted indeed’"it rewards a few groups, on a few days, and only for certain behaviors.
Who will get touched by the targeted tax-cut wand this year?
Hybrid-fuel car owners stand to benefit; the better the mileage, the bigger the tax cut. But, with a sticker price well over $20,000 for most hybrids, this certainly won’t provide relief for lower income Arizonans. Nor will it help a family who needs a new minivan or a construction worker who buys a new truck.
California pulled in $71.5 billion tourist dollars, while Arizona managed "only" $10.5 billion, six times less, and ranked 17 in the nation, according to the Travel Industry Association of America's annual report. The Scottsdale Convention & Visitors Bureau has already used the report as an occasion to call for more taxpayer money to promote the state.
Arizonans paid $2.5 billion in income taxes in 2005, up 34 percent from the last year. What should the state legislature do with the unexpected $700 million? Senate Minority Leader Linda Aguirre, among others, is eager to "invest in Arizona" in other words, let government spend it.
Here's another option: Return it.
A new Arizona ballot initiative would raise taxes on a pack of cigarettes by 80 cents, making ours the fourth-highest cigarette tax in the nation. The state would use the estimated $150 million a year to pay for a variety of new children's programs. Setting aside the merits, or demerits, of the programs themselves, the funding scheme is plain unfair.
Corporate giving is up. In Arizona, Michael Jedlowski, president of Southwestern Furniture Company, will give away 10 households full of furniture to needy families. He's also donated over $500,000 to Phoenix Children's Hospital to help with its neonatal intensive care unit. And it all happened without a government program.
September's spike in gas prices, the result of Hurricane Katrina devastating Gulf Coast oil facilities, has some Arizonans demanding the state crack down on high prices. Arizona attorney general Terry Goddard has promised to introduce anti-gouging legislation next year.
"Pump price increases this week of 30 cents or more a gallon in this state are not justified by Hurricane Katrina or the higher cost of crude oil," Goddard said. "Consumers deserve more protection from this kind of profiteering."
I couldn't have said it better myself. As my predecessor Tom Jenney, vice chairman of the Arizona Federation of Taxpayers, writes:
What do Florida, Nevada, and Texas have in common (besides the heat)?
A. They are among nine states without an income tax.
B. Since 1990 they have seen twice the job and population growth of states with the highest income taxes.
C. All of the above.
If you answered C, you'd be right. Unfortunately, Arizona is the odd man out.