Frequently Searched

The Government Says He’s a Good Dad. Why Won’t They Let Him Adopt?

September 26, 2024

In Wisconsin, it’s legal for single people to adopt children—and it’s legal for married couples to adopt children—but state law forbids a single person who has a stable, loving relationship with a child’s parent from adopting that child legally. This bizarre and self-contradictory law is the subject of a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court filed today by members of the Goldwater Institute’s American Freedom Network of pro bono attorneys and Latham & Watkins LLP. We ask the Supreme Court to take up the case and vindicate the rights of adoptive (or would-be adoptive) families—and to clarify the constitutional rule against arbitrary discrimination.

The case involves a couple, known as A.M.B. and T.G., who have been together for years but who have chosen for their own reasons not to marry. A.M.B. has a teenaged daughter (called M.M.C. in the case) and the pair have raised her together. M.M.C. thinks of T.G. as her dad—and the family would like to legally formalize that relationship. But Wisconsin law forbids that—not because T.G. is unfit; on the contrary, the state admits that he would make a good dad and that it would be in the “best interests of the child” for the adoption to go through. But Wisconsin law prohibits the unmarried partner of a parent from adopting that person’s child.

It’s not that unmarried people can’t adopt—on the contrary, Wisconsin law allows that. But if an unmarried person is in a relationship with the child’s parent, so that the child considers him her father…that’s not allowed.

Amazingly, the Wisconsin Supreme Court held that this discrimination passes constitutional muster. Using so-called “rational basis scrutiny”—a lenient form of judicial review that’s inherently biased in favor of the government—the state judges said the prohibition “serve[s] the legitimate state interest in promoting the adoption of children into stable, marital families.” But that’s senseless, because the law does not prohibit unmarried people from adopting—it expressly permits it. Yet if an unmarried person is in a stable long-term relationship with the parent, adoption is prohibited—even if, as in this case, the state admits that the adoption would be in the child’s best interests. In other words, the law is utterly self-contradictory. And self-contradictory laws are supposed to violate even the lenient “rational basis” test.

In a petition for certiorari filed today by Goldwater and Latham & Watkins, we have urged the justices to take up this case on behalf of A.M.B. and T.G. to vindicate the rights of children and of parents themselves, such as A.M.B., who should have the right to decide whether her partner adopts her child legally—and to explain how the “rational basis” rule is actually supposed to work. Remarkably, nearly a century after the court invented the “rational basis” test, it has never actually explained that—leading to contradictions and confusions that put our most basic constitutional rights at risk.

You can read our brief here.

Timothy Sandefur is the Vice President for Legal Affairs at the Goldwater Institute.

 

 

More on this issue

Donate Now

Help all Americans live freer, happier lives. Join the Goldwater Institute as we defend and strengthen freedom in all 50 states.

Donate Now

Since 1988, the Goldwater Institute has been in the liberty business — defending and promoting freedom, and achieving more than 400 victories in all 50 states. Donate today to help support our mission.

We Protect Your Rights

Our attorneys defend individual rights and protect those who cannot protect themselves.

Need Help? Submit a case.

Get Connected to Goldwater

Sign up for the latest news, event updates, and more.

Wait! Don’t close this yet!

We are grateful for your support of the Goldwater Institute’s efforts to advance and defend liberty throughout the United States. For over 36 years, we’ve been defending the rights of Americans to live their lives free from government interference.

And Goldwater is unique in that we direct our efforts to the 50 states where we introduce and advance innovative ideas that expand freedom. And we fight in courtrooms and capitals nationwide to defend individual liberty.

In 2024 alone, we scored over 50 policy and litigation victories defending liberty!

And that’s just the beginning.

Our plans for 2025 include:

  • Stopping pernicious DEI and other woke programs in America’s universities.
  • Ensuring that patients suffering from rare and terminal diseases have access to cutting-edge, lifesaving medical treatments, without having to first seek permission from the government.
  • Defending parental rights across the United States so that parents can send their kids to the school that best fits their needs, free from leftist indoctrination.
  • Eliminating government interference in the fundamental right of individuals to own property and use it as they see fit.
  • And much, much more

We seek to restore the presumption of liberty; that people are free to act without first asking permission from the government.

But we cannot do this without you. Will you join us as we fight to preserve and advance liberty throughout the country? As we seek new and innovative ways to defend freedom in all 50 states?

And there’s great news: Thanks to a generous Goldwater supporter, your donation today will be doubled!

So please, join us in fighting to advance liberty and score real wins for freedom from coast to coast!