July 17, 2019
Today, the Goldwater Institute has joined a range of conservative groups in signing on to a letter urging members of Congress to oppose the implementation of a $15 federal minimum wage by 2024.
As the letter explains,
“a one-size-fits-all approach to setting a uniform, federal minimum wage will
have disastrous effects on many workers and local and state economies,
especially as earnings vary greatly geographically and from urban areas to
non-urban.”
Below is the full text of the letter:
Dear Members of
Congress:
The undersigned
organizations urge you to oppose the Raise the Wage Act (H.R. 582), which would
set a $15 federal minimum wage by 2024. Alleviating poverty and raising the
standard of living for all Americans is a laudable effort, but study and
experience have shown that government-mandated minimum wages are inferior to
market-determined wages and cause more harm than good.
A one-size-fits-all
approach to setting a uniform, federal minimum wage will have disastrous
effects on many workers and local and state economies, especially as earnings
vary greatly geographically and from urban areas to non-urban.
“As American Enterprise
Institute scholar Mark Perry aptly states, a national minimum wage is really a
“one-size-fits-none approach” because a $15 minimum wage would be harmful in
expensive urban areas and smaller communities alike. However, the negative
impacts felt in urban, high income areas would be even more pronounced in lower
income and non-metro areas that have drastically different costs of living. For
instance, in Fairfax and Loudoun County, Virginia, the median household income
is over $110,000, but in Lincoln County, Montana, the median household income
is only slightly above $35,000. Given the differing economic conditions between
these areas, a federally-mandated minimum wage could create additional economic
problems for people living in and moving across this areas.”
A $15 minimum wage is a
poor mechanism to lift the poor out of poverty. There are tradeoffs to raising
the minimum wage, many of which do more harm to low-skilled workers than help.
Unskilled or inexperienced workers are less attractive to businesses to hire
when the minimum wage is set at a high level. Worse, a minimum wage that prices
low-skilled workers out of a job has long-lasting effects by depriving them the
opportunity to attain skills and increase their productivity by gaining
on-the-job experience.
A study
that examined data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, which spans
three decades, measures the benefit of getting an early start in the workforce.
The findings show the importance of early work experience, which a $15 minimum
wage would stunt. Young adults who merely took on part-time work during high
school saw a wage premium over their unemployed peers. More importantly, the
wage premium held over time: “Checking in when the respondents were in their
40s or 50s, the wage premium held up: The people who held a job in high school
were still earning 9.4 percent more per hour.”
High minimum wages
negatively impact employment. In a comprehensive
review of credible minimum wage research produced over the past several
decades, two economists, one from the Federal Reserve Board and one from University
of California-Irvine, found that 85 percent of the analyses determined it had
negative employment effects.
Recent analysis conducted by the
Congressional Budget Office (CBO) on a $15 minimum wage that is phased-in by
2025 reinforces the above conclusion. In the worst-case scenario, 3.7 million
workers would become jobless. According to the CBO’s median estimate, 1.3
million workers would lose their jobs. In addition, the CBO estimates a $15 minimum
wage would ultimately “reduce total real income by about $9 billion in 2025.”
In other words, total income in the United States would be greater without a
minimum wage hike.
And, importantly,
raising the minimum wage comes at an expense of the unemployed, businesses, and
higher prices for consumers. A $15 minimum wage results in business owners’
income decreasing by $14 billion, earnings of unemployed individuals would
decrease by $20 billion, and income of consumers would decrease by $39 billion,
according to CBO estimates.
The undersigned
organizations urge members of Congress to oppose the Raise the Wage Act and
instead work to remove needless tax and regulatory barriers to work and cut red
tape that makes it difficult to start a business.
Sincerely,
Trey Kovacs
Labor Policy Analyst
Competitive Enterprise Institute
Lisa B. Nelson
CEO
ALEC Action
Phil Kerpen
President
American Commitment
Brent Wm. Gardner
Chief Government Affairs Officer
Americans for Prosperity
Tom Giovanetti
President
Americans for a Strong Economy
Grover Norquist
President
Americans for Tax Reform
Norman Singleton
President
Campaign for Liberty
Andrew F. Quinlan
President
Center for Freedom and Prosperity
Timothy Lee
Senior Vice President of Legal and Public Affairs
Center for Individual Freedom
Olivia Grady
Executive Director
Center for Worker Freedom
David McIntosh
President
Club for Growth
Nathan A. Benefield
Vice President & Chief Operating Officer
Commonwealth Foundation
Matthew Kandrach
President
Consumer Action for a Strong Economy
Tom Schatz
President
Council for Citizens Against Government Waste
Robert Roper
President
Ethan Allen Institute
Adam Brandon
President
FreedomWorks
Victor Riches
President & CEO
Goldwater Institute
Dr. Bob McClure
President and CEO
The James Madison Institute
Seton Motley
President
Less Government
Michael LaFaive
Senior Director of Fiscal Policy
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Pete Sepp
President
National Taxpayers Union
Daniel Erspamer
CEO
Pelican Institute
Karen Kerrigan
President & CEO
Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council
David Williams
President
Taxpayers Protection Alliance
Paul Guppy
Vice President for Research
Washington Policy Center
Cliff Maloney
President
Young Americans for Liberty
