Frequently Searched

Appeals court sides with tattoo shop in fight with Mesa

October 31, 2014

by Art Thomason, Arizona Republic

The Mesa City Council denied two tattoo artists the constitutional protections of free speech by rejecting their efforts to open a business two years ago, the Arizona Court of Appeals said Thursday.

The decision – a first by any Arizona court on the issue of free speech protections for tattoo artists – reversed a Maricopa County Superior Court ruling that sided with the city.

“We hold that obtaining a tattoo, applying a tattoo and engaging in the business of tattooing are exercises of free speech entitled to protection as a fundamental right under the Arizona Constitution and the United States Constitution,” the appeals court’s presiding judge, Ann Timmer, wrote in the 31-page opinion.

The court was asked by the Goldwater Instituteto determine whether the City Council denied the constitutional rights of two tattoo artists by denying them an operating permit.

The case stems from the council’s March 2009 decision to deny a permit for Ryan and Laetitia Coleman, who live in Nice, France, to open Angel Tattoo in a strip mall on the southeastern corner of Dobson and Baseline roads. During the council meeting, several neighbors said they feared that the tattoo parlor would drag down the area’s quality of life. Mayor Scott Smith cast the only yes vote.

The shopping center has been plagued by vacancies since a Basha’s supermarket closed there several years ago.

The Colemans then sued Mesa, alleging their rights had been violated. Last year a county judge upheld the city’s right to govern tattoo parlors under a “council use permit” process that gives the city wide discretion to approve or deny certain types of businesses.

Clint Bolick, an attorney for the Goldwater Institute and director of its Institute’s Scharf-Norton Center for Constitutional Litigation, argued for the Colemans, calling the permit process “subjective.”

The question about how tattooing is free speech was raised by judges during the hearing.

At one point Judge Patrick Irvine asked Bolick, “Why is tattooing speech at all? And if it’s speech, why isn’t a hairdresser speech? People spend a lot of time on their hair, and they’re making a statement with it, and so why isn’t a hairdresser speech?”

Bolick replied:. “The only difference between a portrait is the medium that’s being used is not canvas but someone’s skin. And it’s even more important than a painting because it becomes a part of the person.”

Scott Holcomb, the attorney representing Mesa, argued that a business, not free speech, was being regulated by the city. “This case does not deal with any type of First Amendment rights at all,” Holcomb said.

Timmer said in Thursday’s opinion that the superior court had erred by dismissing the Colemans’ complaint “without affording an opportunity to develop a factual record. We therefore reverse and remand for additional proceedings.”

Mayor Smith said Thursday the city’s attorneys will have an opportunity to present the court with a record in the case that’s “a lot deeper.”

That record, he said, will include additional reasons that the city had for denying the permit.

The appeals court decision is the second in the last nine years that the city has lost an appeals case based on citizens’ rights.

Mesa turned a local brake shop owner into a national icon for property rights when the Arizona Court of Appeals ruled in 2002 that the city wrongly seized his business through eminent domain so it could be sold to a developer.

 

 

More on this issue

Donate Now

Help all Americans live freer, happier lives. Join the Goldwater Institute as we defend and strengthen freedom in all 50 states.

Donate Now

Since 1988, the Goldwater Institute has been in the liberty business — defending and promoting freedom, and achieving more than 400 victories in all 50 states. Donate today to help support our mission.

We Protect Your Rights

Our attorneys defend individual rights and protect those who cannot protect themselves.

Need Help? Submit a case.

Get Connected to Goldwater

Sign up for the latest news, event updates, and more.

Wait! Don’t close this yet!

We are grateful for your support of the Goldwater Institute’s efforts to advance and defend liberty throughout the United States. For over 36 years, we’ve been defending the rights of Americans to live their lives free from government interference.

And Goldwater is unique in that we direct our efforts to the 50 states where we introduce and advance innovative ideas that expand freedom. And we fight in courtrooms and capitals nationwide to defend individual liberty.

In 2024 alone, we scored over 50 policy and litigation victories defending liberty!

And that’s just the beginning.

Our plans for 2025 include:

  • Stopping pernicious DEI and other woke programs in America’s universities.
  • Ensuring that patients suffering from rare and terminal diseases have access to cutting-edge, lifesaving medical treatments, without having to first seek permission from the government.
  • Defending parental rights across the United States so that parents can send their kids to the school that best fits their needs, free from leftist indoctrination.
  • Eliminating government interference in the fundamental right of individuals to own property and use it as they see fit.
  • And much, much more

We seek to restore the presumption of liberty; that people are free to act without first asking permission from the government.

But we cannot do this without you. Will you join us as we fight to preserve and advance liberty throughout the country? As we seek new and innovative ways to defend freedom in all 50 states?

And there’s great news: Thanks to a generous Goldwater supporter, your donation today will be doubled!

So please, join us in fighting to advance liberty and score real wins for freedom from coast to coast!