July 22, 2019
By Matt Miller
How much pain can the
government inflict upon a citizen in order to get its way? That question, which
is controlled by the excessive fines clauses of the U.S. and most state
constitutions, is front-and-center in several lawsuits currently pending in
Florida. USA Today recently featured
a lengthy
article on one Florida city that is trying to take people’s homes over
accumulated fines for tall grass and weeds.
What Dunedin, Florida,
is doing to these people is indeed outrageous. The fines may “only” be around
$250 per day, but they quickly accumulate into the tens-of-thousands of
dollars. Homeowners are unable to pay these accumulated fines, which can lead
to government liens and, ultimately, foreclosure.
That’s bad enough. But
what if the fines started at $20,000 for the first offense, and
escalated in $20,000 increments to $100,000 for your fifth offense? What if,
instead of accumulating $30,000 in fines over a period of months, you could
accumulate $300,000 in fines in just five days?
That is the situation
in Miami Beach, where
the Goldwater Institute represents homeowner Natalie Nichols in a case filed
against the city last summer.
In Miami Beach, the
fines aren’t even for overgrown weeds, which are, arguably, at least a minor
nuisance for neighbors. Instead, the city imposes $20,000 to $100,000 fines for
doing nothing more than renting your home on Airbnb or HomeAway. You don’t have
to be running a party house. Indeed, different, longstanding laws cover actual
nuisance behavior. But the city says it’s too much work to enforce those
laws.
Your guests can be
quiet as a church mouse and respectful of all the rules, and your very first
fine will be for $20,000. Keep it up and you will—as many Miami Beach property
owners have found—be facing $300,000 or more in fines. If you don’t pay, the
law expressly says that the city can seize not only your rental property, but any
property you own. All for doing nothing more than peacefully renting your home
as a short-term rental.
This is excessive under
the excessive fines clauses of both the U.S. and Florida constitutions. In
legal filings, Miami Beach claims that the fines are necessary to deter wealthy
property owners from renting their homes and then paying lower fine amounts as
a cost of doing business. But most homeowners in the city are not
ultra-wealthy. The city’s argument is tantamount to saying “we have to fine
everyone $20,000 for speeding, because otherwise Ferrari owners will just pay
the speeding tickets but not stop speeding.”
Well, what about the
rest of us? Fortunately, the Constitution protects people from excessive fines,
even if that means wealthy people might sometimes be able to pay minor
penalties without worrying about it.
Fundamentally, our
state and federal constitutions protect us from being fined into oblivion by
the government for minor violations of the law. No matter how much we might
dislike tall weeds, nobody should lose his or her home over them. And no matter
how much some people might dislike the idea of home-sharing, nobody should lose
his or her house for doing nothing more than peacefully renting a room to
someone for the night.
Serious penalties
should only be imposed for serious violations of the law. If a company
knowingly dumps toxic chemicals in a river, the government can and should fine
it hundreds of thousands of dollars, or more. But tall weeds, or short-term
rentals, demand a lesser penalty because they are much more minor offenses.
This is the kind of proportionality demanded by constitutional guarantees
against excessive fines.
It is heartening to see
people talking about excessive fines again. Interest in them was significantly
renewed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Timbs v. Indiana, which
held that the protections of the Eighth Amendment apply to actions by state and
local governments. But there is still much work to be done. Much as “Florida Man”
regularly captures the nation’s attention for his outrageous and stupid antics,
Florida cities are presenting an embarrassing example of outrageous government
overreach as they weaponize fines against essentially peaceful citizens. This
must end. It will end. The protections of our state and federal constitutions
demand nothing less.
Matt Miller
is a Senior Attorney at the Goldwater Institute. He represents the plaintiff in the Miami Beach home-sharing case Nichols
v. City of Miami Beach.