Frequently Searched

Goldwater Institute Joins the Fight against California’s Anti-Freelancing Law

May 22, 2020

May 22, 2020
By Timothy Sandefur

California’s job-killing AB5 was written months before the coronavirus pandemic. But the surge in demand for freelance workers—everything from DoorDash delivery to independent journalists—has made all the clearer why laws that deprive people of freedom of economic choice are such a bad idea.

AB5 restricts this freedom by forcing employers to count workers as “employees” rather than freelancers in many circumstances, and because it’s far more expensive and complicated to have an “employee” than to hire a freelancer, the result is to handicap economic growth right at the cusp of the worst economic downturn in nearly a century.

Among the worst of AB5’s rules is its 35-article limit on freelance journalists. You read that right: The law prohibits freelancers from submitting more than 35 articles or photographs to a newspaper or a magazine. Actually, it’s more complicated than that: the 35-item quota only applies to articles or photos that “pertain” to a “topic” or “event.” If you’re an abstract artist or an experimental poet, you can submit more than 35.

Of course, this restriction is hardest on small, niche newspapers, who rely heavily on freelancers because they can’t afford the heavy expenses associated with the “employee” category in California. NBC News or the Los Angeles Times might be able to afford to hire writers into their staffs and pay their benefits, but small alt-weeklies and community newspapers can’t.

Represented by our friends at the Pacific Legal Foundation, a group of freelance journalists sued, arguing that the 35-item quota violates the First Amendment. That case was thrown out by a federal judge months ago, and it is now on appeal before the Ninth Circuit. We filed this brief in the case, explaining that since the law requires a judge to look at the content of an article or a photo in order to decide whether it counts against the 35-item limit, it’s therefore a “content-based” speech restriction—which violates one of the strictest rules in First Amendment law. Consider, for example, the weekly column written by former U.S. Poet Laureate Ted Kooser. Every week, his column features a poem by a different writer, along with his thoughts about that poem. If the article were run without Kooser’s commentary, it likely would not count as one of the 35 items, because many poems don’t “pertain” to a “topic.” But with his one- or two-paragraph commentary, the article would count, because that makes it “pertain” to the topic of that poem. A beautiful art photo of a flower would not count—while a photojournalist’s picture of a riot would, because it “pertains” to an “event.”

But the concern here goes beyond freedom of speech. People take freelance jobs because they want to—they have good reasons. Such jobs are often more flexible and give workers a sense of independence that they don’t get from an on-staff position. When the government takes that choice away, it often pretends it’s doing so for people’s benefit. But people themselves are in the best position to make those choices. Legal barriers against people’s freedom to make their own choices are both immoral and economically foolhardy, since they prevent economic growth and make it harder for people to obtain the services they need. That’s the last thing government should be doing at a time of massive unemployment.

You can read more about the case here, and read our brief here.

Timothy Sandefur is the Vice President for Litigation at the Goldwater Institute.

 

 

More on this issue

Donate Now

Help all Americans live freer, happier lives. Join the Goldwater Institute as we defend and strengthen freedom in all 50 states.

Donate Now

Since 1988, the Goldwater Institute has been in the liberty business — defending and promoting freedom, and achieving more than 400 victories in all 50 states. Donate today to help support our mission.

We Protect Your Rights

Our attorneys defend individual rights and protect those who cannot protect themselves.

Need Help? Submit a case.

Get Connected to Goldwater

Sign up for the latest news, event updates, and more.

Wait! Don’t close this yet!

We are grateful for your support of the Goldwater Institute’s efforts to advance and defend liberty throughout the United States. For over 36 years, we’ve been defending the rights of Americans to live their lives free from government interference.

And Goldwater is unique in that we direct our efforts to the 50 states where we introduce and advance innovative ideas that expand freedom. And we fight in courtrooms and capitals nationwide to defend individual liberty.

In 2024 alone, we scored over 50 policy and litigation victories defending liberty!

And that’s just the beginning.

Our plans for 2025 include:

  • Stopping pernicious DEI and other woke programs in America’s universities.
  • Ensuring that patients suffering from rare and terminal diseases have access to cutting-edge, lifesaving medical treatments, without having to first seek permission from the government.
  • Defending parental rights across the United States so that parents can send their kids to the school that best fits their needs, free from leftist indoctrination.
  • Eliminating government interference in the fundamental right of individuals to own property and use it as they see fit.
  • And much, much more

We seek to restore the presumption of liberty; that people are free to act without first asking permission from the government.

But we cannot do this without you. Will you join us as we fight to preserve and advance liberty throughout the country? As we seek new and innovative ways to defend freedom in all 50 states?

And there’s great news: Thanks to a generous Goldwater supporter, your donation today will be doubled!

So please, join us in fighting to advance liberty and score real wins for freedom from coast to coast!