Frequently Searched

Ninth Circuit Refuses to Change Election Laws in the Middle of a Crisis

May 8, 2020

May 8, 2020
By Timothy Sandefur

A panel of federal appellate court judges this week refused to issue an order requiring Arizona officials to allow petition gatherers to accept online “signatures” in contravention of state law.

In the federal lawsuit, several initiative campaigns claimed that the shutdowns caused by the coronavirus pandemic had made it too hard to gather the signatures necessary to place their initiatives on the ballot, and therefore that laws requiring in-person signatures violated the federal Constitution. But as we argued in friend of the court briefs before the trial court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, this difficulty is not good reason for disregarding the state’s rules governing the initiative process.

In particular, Arizona’s so-called Voter Protection Act makes it prohibitively difficult to repeal or amend initiatives once they’re adopted—even if they contain important mistakes that nobody noticed during the campaign. Unlike elections for candidates—who can be recalled or voted out of office if voters are dissatisfied with their performance—elections for initiatives are often one-way streets. And that’s good reason for the state to require scrupulous compliance with the procedures for placing an initiative on the ballot.

The trial court dismissed the case, and the campaigns appealed to the Ninth Circuit, asking the judges to issue a temporary order allowing them to proceed with electronic signatures right away, and then decide the legal questions later. Of course, such an order would have essentially decided the case, given the fact that the election is approaching so rapidly. We joined the Arizona Attorney General in urging the court to deny that request, which it did on Tuesday.

Meanwhile, a similar lawsuit is still pending in the Arizona Supreme Court, where we filed this brief, making similar arguments. Electronic signature gathering might or might not be a good idea, but that question should be decided after an open and fair debate in public—it shouldn’t be decided in court in the middle of a once-in-a-century emergency. Changing the rules for elections in the midst of a crisis is never a good idea. Instead, emergencies are times when we should take care to follow the rules that have already been set down in our state’s fundamental law.

Timothy Sandefur is the Vice President for Litigation at the Goldwater Institute.

 

 

More on this issue

Donate Now

Help all Americans live freer, happier lives. Join the Goldwater Institute as we defend and strengthen freedom in all 50 states.

Donate Now

Since 1988, the Goldwater Institute has been in the liberty business — defending and promoting freedom, and achieving more than 400 victories in all 50 states. Donate today to help support our mission.

We Protect Your Rights

Our attorneys defend individual rights and protect those who cannot protect themselves.

Need Help? Submit a case.

Get Connected to Goldwater

Sign up for the latest news, event updates, and more.

Wait! Don’t close this yet!

We are grateful for your support of the Goldwater Institute’s efforts to advance and defend liberty throughout the United States. For over 36 years, we’ve been defending the rights of Americans to live their lives free from government interference.

And Goldwater is unique in that we direct our efforts to the 50 states where we introduce and advance innovative ideas that expand freedom. And we fight in courtrooms and capitals nationwide to defend individual liberty.

In 2024 alone, we scored over 50 policy and litigation victories defending liberty!

And that’s just the beginning.

Our plans for 2025 include:

  • Stopping pernicious DEI and other woke programs in America’s universities.
  • Ensuring that patients suffering from rare and terminal diseases have access to cutting-edge, lifesaving medical treatments, without having to first seek permission from the government.
  • Defending parental rights across the United States so that parents can send their kids to the school that best fits their needs, free from leftist indoctrination.
  • Eliminating government interference in the fundamental right of individuals to own property and use it as they see fit.
  • And much, much more

We seek to restore the presumption of liberty; that people are free to act without first asking permission from the government.

But we cannot do this without you. Will you join us as we fight to preserve and advance liberty throughout the country? As we seek new and innovative ways to defend freedom in all 50 states?

And there’s great news: Thanks to a generous Goldwater supporter, your donation today will be doubled!

So please, join us in fighting to advance liberty and score real wins for freedom from coast to coast!