Frequently Searched

Goldwater Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Enforce Limits on FDA’s Authority over Stem Cell Treatments

June 18, 2025

The Goldwater Institute submitted a friend-of-the-court brief to the U.S. Supreme Court today in a lawsuit challenging the Food and Drug Administration’s authority to restrict access to individualized medical treatments involving stem cells. Months ago, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals declared that these treatments—which involve the removal of a patient’s cells, and then their re-insertion back into the patient’s body—qualify as a kind of “drug” that can be regulated by Washington, D.C., bureaucrats. But as we argue in our brief, the FDA isn’t supposed to be in the business of regulating the practice of medicine—and to interpret this treatment as a “drug” is to step far past the line Congress drew to limit federal power.

The FDA has authority to regulate “drugs”—that is, medicines that are bought, sold, and used in the United States—but it doesn’t have power to regulate the practice of medicine. That’s something states do, instead. Federal law defines “drugs” as “articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or other animals.” The FDA has also adopted a rule called the “single surgical procedure” rule, which says that if a doctor removes a patient’s tissue on the operating table, treats it in some way, and then re-inserts it into the patient, that doesn’t qualify as the application of a new drug, and doesn’t need to be regulated by D.C. officials.

That makes sense. The reason the FDA was created over a century ago was to ensure that Americans knew what was in the medicines they were buying, selling, and using. It exists to prevent fraud or “mislabeling,” and Congress’s power to create the FDA comes from the Constitution’s “commerce” clause, which allows Congress to regulate the buying and selling of goods. But removing tissue from a patient on the operating table and putting it back into the patient is not buying and selling medicines or engaging in interstate commerce.

That might all sound academic, were it not for the invention of cutting-edge individualized medical treatments involving stem cells. These treatments, which show great promise for improving or even eliminating life-threatening conditions, are tailor-made for patients, because they involve taking a person’s own cells, treating them, and then re-implanting them back into the patient, where they can grow, spread, and even fix unhealthy tissues.

That’s not a drug, obviously—but in September the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that such treatments fall within the FDA’s jurisdiction because under the “wide-ranging” legal definition of that term, the law applied to “an article derived mainly from human tissue and intended to treat … diseases.”

Of course, expanding the FDA’s authority in such a broad manner will stifle medical innovation and worsen the situation for patients—not to mention medical researchers—whose work might hold the key to the next breakthrough discovery. Federal drug approval is an expensive and slow process that can take over a decade and a half to obtain the go-ahead for even a single life-saving medicine.

Worse, as we argue in our brief, the decision intrudes on the right of medical autonomy—the right of every person to decide for him- or herself what medical treatments to take to improve or even save their lives. As we write in the brief, this principle of autonomy is a bedrock concept in medical ethics. It’s the patient’s life, and it should be the patient’s choice: “The most basic of all rights is the right to one’s own body. Indeed, the Due Process Clause even protects a person’s right to cut or not cut his own hair. If a patient has a constitutionally protected interest in something as trivial as a haircut, then she certainly has an interest in using her own body in an effort to defend herself against a disease; especially where, as here, the treatments involve an individual’s own unaltered cells to treat degenerative disorders that can be life-threatening.”

In fact, just last week, Goldwater Institute Senior Fellow Jeffrey Singer, M.D., discussed the principle of medical autonomy in an online conversation about his new book Your Body, Your Health Care:

We’ve asked the Supreme Court to take up this case, to enforce meaningful limits on FDA power, and to preserve the right of patients to defend and improve their own lives. You can read our brief here, and learn more about our work in defense of medical autonomy here.

 

 

More on this issue

Donate Now

Help all Americans live freer, happier lives. Join the Goldwater Institute as we defend and strengthen freedom in all 50 states.

Donate Now

Since 1988, the Goldwater Institute has been in the liberty business — defending and promoting freedom, and achieving more than 400 victories in all 50 states. Donate today to help support our mission.

We Protect Your Rights

Our attorneys defend individual rights and protect those who cannot protect themselves.

Need Help? Submit a case.

Get Connected to Goldwater

Sign up for the latest news, event updates, and more.

Wait! Don’t close this yet!

We are grateful for your support of the Goldwater Institute’s efforts to advance and defend liberty throughout the United States. For over 36 years, we’ve been defending the rights of Americans to live their lives free from government interference.

And Goldwater is unique in that we direct our efforts to the 50 states where we introduce and advance innovative ideas that expand freedom. And we fight in courtrooms and capitals nationwide to defend individual liberty.

In 2024 alone, we scored over 50 policy and litigation victories defending liberty!

And that’s just the beginning.

Our plans for 2025 include:

  • Stopping pernicious DEI and other woke programs in America’s universities.
  • Ensuring that patients suffering from rare and terminal diseases have access to cutting-edge, lifesaving medical treatments, without having to first seek permission from the government.
  • Defending parental rights across the United States so that parents can send their kids to the school that best fits their needs, free from leftist indoctrination.
  • Eliminating government interference in the fundamental right of individuals to own property and use it as they see fit.
  • And much, much more

We seek to restore the presumption of liberty; that people are free to act without first asking permission from the government.

But we cannot do this without you. Will you join us as we fight to preserve and advance liberty throughout the country? As we seek new and innovative ways to defend freedom in all 50 states?

And there’s great news: Thanks to a generous Goldwater supporter, your donation today will be doubled!

So please, join us in fighting to advance liberty and score real wins for freedom from coast to coast!